Supreme Court: In Partition Suit, Every Interested Party Considered a Plaintiff; No Limitation on Issuing Multiple Preliminary Decrees


In a significant legal pronouncement, a Division Bench of the Supreme Court has made a pivotal observation that holds substantial implications for partition suits. The Court emphasized that in a partition suit, each and every party with a vested interest is regarded as a plaintiff in their own right. This recognition underscores the essential principle that partition suits aim to equitably distribute properties among co-owners, making all concerned parties plaintiffs to the proceedings.

The Court’s pronouncement reinforces the inclusive nature of partition suits, ensuring that the rights and interests of all co-owners are fully acknowledged and addressed within the legal framework. This ensures that the court can comprehensively examine the claims and counterclaims of all parties involved, facilitating a just and equitable distribution of the property in question.

Furthermore, the Court’s ruling clarifies that there is no legal restriction on the issuance of multiple preliminary decrees in such cases. This flexibility allows the court to tailor its orders and decrees to the specific circumstances of the case, ensuring that the partition process is executed in a manner that best serves the interests of all parties involved.

In essence, this decision reiterates the equitable nature of partition suits, emphasizing the legal principle that every co-owner’s rights and claims are entitled to equal consideration, and the court has the discretion to pass preliminary decrees as necessary to achieve a fair and just partition of the property.

Related articles


Recent articles